On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:54 -0700, Gregory P. Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:32 -0700, Gregory Smith wrote: > >> > >> Lucas: This one likely conflicts slightly with your recent setuptools > >> version change patch. On recent RPM based distros I suspect they have > >> a similar python-setuptools package available of sufficiently recent > >> version that the change below could be extended to support installing > >> the OS package on those as well. > > > > Oh, sorry, I have applied that patch like an hour ago :( I will see how > > to extend the change to include recent rpm based distros on it as > > well... Do you think it's better to revert the version bump change? If > > so, I'll do it right away. > > > > Lucas > > > No, I think your version bump change needs to stay in. > > Looking at my CL, I think the change from 0.6c9 to 0.6 would actually > break things for non recent debian/ubuntu users. oops. :( > > I made that change so that the version comparison against the ubuntu > lucid package version would work. > > Anyways, I'd suggest not applying my patch to svn until you've looked > into adding rpm support. I guess it needs a change to the version > checking as well.
Yes, it's high time I finish the software_manager library that is sitting on my hard drive for over an year now :( It's an abstraction layer, like PackageKit, that would help to manage software installation through the distro way of doing it. > -gps _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
