On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:29:56PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > After much thought about this subject, I went ahead and pushed a non > fast forward update to the autotest repo, rewriting the project's > history effectively, assigning authorship where it belongs and getting > old cruft from the svn days. > > We decided to do it because: > * It's more fair to the over 200 contributors we had over the years > > $ git shortlog -s | wc -l > 202 > > * Stats do matter, with a more properly written history it'll be easier > to generate relevant stats for people, using git. > > So, let's consider this a much needed housekeeping initiative, and sorry > for the inconveniences.
The result is much better than expected, very good work, totally worth it. Cheers - Ademar > > Now, for 3rd party, I ask you guys to rebase. I did all my rebases using > git format-patch and re-applying the patches cleanly on newly created > branches, and you might well do the same (unless there's some fancy > ninja git tool to do it without using patches at all). I'll be available > to assist you, should you need any help. > > Thank you! > > Lucas > > > _______________________________________________ > Autotest mailing list > [email protected] > http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest -- Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. Red Hat ^[:wq! _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
