On 12.06.2012 [14:11:27 -0400], Cleber Rosa wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I've just found what's going on. boottool code requires grubby >= > > 8.11, which at the time, meant an unreleased version. > > > > So, our patches for grubby have not yet been commited, and now, with > > grubby 8.11 and 8.12 shipping on many recent distros, the native > > grubby binary is recent enough for boottool, but lacks necessary > > features. > > > > I'm preparing a fix, and will ping the grubby maintainer again. > > > > Thanks for reporting this. > > CR. > > > > So, to be clear, this is *also* happening when native grubby >= 8.11. > The enviroment reported by Steve is different, but the end result is > the same, so I believe they are closely related.
Does it make sense to just always build & install the grubby from autotest? I know it might mean down-revving, but if we need some specific set of features/code, it makes sense to be certain they are always there. -Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]> IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
