Mark, > -Nested macros now respect grammatical restrictions properly.
Is this expected to fix the issue that I was encountering with “Method_is stable at_”? > -"_†" parsing no longer directly consumes a token, but expects a variable use > phrase instead. Did you mean "_`↑” ? Because that’s what you seem to have meant, based on my type analysis of your comment. > I also checked in the beginning of some work that recursively describes why a > particular simple expression (or other simple parse) was being requested at a > specific token in the parse. It needs more work before it’ll be useful, > however. Sounds good! I’ll give it a try later. -- Todd L Smith CEO | The Avail Foundation, LLC http://www.availlang.org
