>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> how do you feel about specifying in ConnectionHandler's contract
>> that the caller is responsible for shutting the connection down
>> and the handler shouldn't bother? I am attaching a patch to that
>> effect.
Peter> I get a bit nervous ;) The Connection stuff is fairly widely
Peter> used. Whats your motivation for this?
I just want to make the behavior already implemented by
DefaultConnectionManager part of the contract. It is a legitimate
question after all: "Who gets to close the socket?" And I don't see
a reason not to make it part of the ConnectionManager responsibility.
It's the one that creates the socket after all...
Bye
Greg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
