Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> [last para from Berin email]
> > To be honest, I would have a real problem if we didn't go beta because
> > you didn't get to remove excalibur into a new CVS. According to all the
> > feedback, noone agrees with the move--so why do it? And why punish those
> > of us who want beta and stability because we don't have a separate CVS?
>
> Can I just confirm a couple of things -
> perhaps its just me sifting through what is noise and what is serious....
> but I would appreciate confirmation of the following two points:
>
> 1. there was a proposed creating a new CVS to which there was uniform
> disagreement ... therefore, I am presuming that it now off the agenda
> (after all, this is an open process - and votes count)
Yes. (Hopefully noone thinks it is still on the agenda for beta release)
> 2. I'm assuming the "veto" comment was off-the-cuff and should not be
> taken seriously ... (but if I'm wrong, then there is a very serious
> issue!)
I sure hope so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
