Charles Benett wrote:
>
> Any objections to me moving phoenix and cornerstone from avalonapi.jar
> to avalon-framework & avalon-excalibur?
>
> Are we going to distribute avalon with name-version or just name jars?
When it comes to the real distribution, it is name-version jars. This
provides a couple of advantages in that when someone gives a problem
report, they can tell us the name of the released jar (hense the version).
It also lets the users know at a glance when there is something new
available.
That being said, I have been against anything that programatically tries
to discover the version of a jar by encoding it into the filename. This
is because library versioning is something that needs to be addressed
by a not easily modifiable (by the user) method or it is inherently broken.
Until we enter Code Freeze, I propose that you use the unversioned jars.
Once we release, then you need to transition to the used jars.
If I have thoroughly confused you, here it is simply put:
Until Beta 1 Release:
avalon-framework.jar
avalon-excalibur.jar
After Beta 1 Release:
avalon-framework-4.0b1.jar
avalon-excalibur-4.0b1.jar
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
