Peter Donald wrote:
>
> At 12:16 3/5/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> >COURSE OF ACTION
> >----------------
> >Yes) We do the migration by Friday May 4 and release LogKit 2.0b1(?)
> >along
> > with Avalon Framework/Excalibur 4.0b1
> >
> >No) We do NOT migrate LogKit for a LONG while (at least two full
> >release
> > cycles for Framework). In any event, LogKit (version number?)
> >should
> > be marked Beta1 along with Framework/Excalibur
>
> Would you mind waiting to the 5th - then I could update Logkit the way I
> wanted to and that should remain stable.
Nope. Don't mind a bit.
> >REASONING
> >---------
> >LogKit, Framework, and Excalibur are projects that are used directly by
> >developers. It is critical that the API be stable. There really hasn't
> >been much change to the LogKit API in a while--mostly just feature
> >enhancements and bug fixes. The critical API used in clients is the
> >Logger interface (which hasn't changed almost since the beginning)
>
> I don't think it has changed in any non-backwards incopmatible way at all ;)
That's cool. But the time to change is upon us. Might as well sneak a few
cool features in as well.... :)
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
