> Peter Donald wrote:
> >
> > At 09:53 AM 6/6/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> > >I would like to propose a vote to release 4.0b3 for
> > >Avalon/Excalibur (quietly no general announcements)
> > >due to a major bug I found in Excalibur's Component
> > >Management framework. The bug stemmed from the
> > >deprecation of the DefaultComponentManager/Selector
> > >and moving to ExcaliburComponentManager/Selector.
> > >
> > >The DefaultComponentFactory tested to see if we
> > >have an instance of a "DefaultComponentSelector"
> > >instead of the "ExcaliburComponentSelector". When
> > >I migrated Cocoon to use the propper version of
> > >the ComponentSelector, this ugly bug showed up.
> > >
> > >
> > >I would like to test and then release Beta 3 for
> > >Framework/Excalibur. I am updating the Change
> > >docs now.
> >
> > Fine by me. I would prefer minor releases for this sort of
> thing (ie 2.1)
> > but 3 works for me aswell ;)
>
> +1 for release
> Slight preference for 4.0b3 over 4.0b2.1 but not fussed
> Charles
+1 to that.
Leo, who is going to write an avalon-based/JAMES-compatible/
Tomcat-contained webmail client for his new employer, but has lots
of problems getting them to allow an OS release...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
