> Hi,
>
> Once Berin finishes the docs what do you all think of doing a release of
> framework (as stable), logkit (as stable), excalibur (as beta),
> phoenix/cornerstone (as alpha). The reason is that I am getting
> weekly emails
> asking where they can download a release of phoenix and it is not
> "released"
> as such ;)
+1
> And if so what version should we place on Phoenix/Cornerstone ? I
> would put a
> 1.0a1 on Cornerstone but not sure about Phoenix.
Well, the previous 'release' was 3.1a1, which included Cornerstone and
Phoenix. In that context, I'd say we need a bigger version number than
3.1.
I'd say we name both of them 3.5a1. The .5 instead of .2 because of
significant progress and change since that last release.
> Also is now the time that we can separate excalibur? ;) The docs are
> separate, the produced jars are separate, the source directories
> are separate
> so it should be relatively painless.
+1
> Also I have tried to clean up and simplify the releases directory. I have
> placed HEADER.html files in all the right places to make it clearer about
> where to get stuff. Also what do you think of anytime we make a
> new release
> we also create a HEADER.html in the release directory that lists
> ChangeLog or
> something similar?
probably a good idea ;)
greetz,
Leo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
