Re: JDK 1.4beta and DefaultConfigurationBuilder

[Berin Loritsch]

Stephen McConnell wrote:
> 
> I think you need something like two alternative implementation classes -
> for example, the current DefaultConfigurationBuilder (for compatibility)
> and a new JAXPConfigurationBuilder. The JAXPConfigurationBuilder
> compilation could be excluded with a few lines in the ant build file if
> the javax.xml classes are unavailable.  At runtime we can test the vm
> version (or available classes) in order to select the actual builder
> class to use.

It will always test TRUE.  The reason is that Avalon is build with Xerces
which have the JAXP parsers available.

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature