On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:25, Stuart Roebuck wrote:
> I was just thinking of writing a test case for LogKit when I noticed the
> introduction of other unit tests and thought... great!

;)

> But then I discovered that Avalon contains it's own Unit test framework
> and I thought, "oh no - not another API to learn, what's wrong with JUnit?
> ".

well I don't like some of design decisions in it but there is nothing wrong 
with junit. In fact there is many things right with junit ;)

> Please tell me there's a sensible reason for all this duplication and that
> it's not because the open source community is not collaborating, or is
> suffering from the "not invented here" syndrome!

Well testlet is something I have been using forever in my own projects. Much 
of the code that I imported into avalon from these existing projects already 
had unit tests in testlet. Besides I couldn't be bothered learning another 
API ;)

As soon as we need something thats in junit or it's associated infrastructure 
(reports from ant come to mind) then we will prolly switch. Eventually after 
ant2 is released I plan to go back and rehack testlet in it's mold. Basically 
a way to do all sorts of tests (unit/functional,black/white box etc) in one 
medium. However till then ... ;)

Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to