Peter Donald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 06:10, giacomo wrote:
>
>>I have to confess that I don't know how this works in all my components
>>that are based on AbstractLoggable and have the logger passed in from
>>ExcaliburCM.
>>
>
> Just looked at ExcaliburCM and it doesn't really support separate loggers per
> component. Berin what do you think of adding an extra attribute to component
> definition so that you can specify name of logger. Then later on instead of
> doing
I was thinking about that before. We need to add an attribute to the component
definitions (probably "logger"). Something like this to specify it:
<component role="com.foo.Component"
class="com.foo.DefaultComponent"
logger="foo"/>
The attribute name is negotiable ;).
Think this will help, combined with your changes for the Logger?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
