[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Berin,
>
> I just got to testing the new version of the pooling in CVS. I got the same
> results as I did with my version, so that should be OK :)
Faster or slower? I think the fact that we are not releasing and reclaiming
locks or continual looping helps bring our efficiency up.
> I still have some problems in my load test, but that is all related to
> SQLTransformer. I'll discuss that on C2-dev.
The SQLTransformer gets 2 connections for every request--that needs to change,
or the pool of connections needs to be greatly increased....
> Seems to me excalibur has a loadproof pooling now :)
>
> tomK
That was my surmizing as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
