> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: vrijdag 10 augustus 2001 15:03
> To: Avalon Development
> Subject: Re: [Excalibur] DefaultPool: Could not create enough
> components
> to service your request
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hi Berin,
> >
> > I just got to testing the new version of the pooling in
> CVS. I got the same
> > results as I did with my version, so that should be OK :)
>
> Faster or slower? I think the fact that we are not releasing
> and reclaiming
> locks or continual looping helps bring our efficiency up.
I didn't look at the performance an sich. The fact that it's stable is more
important to us ATM than the fact that it's fast. But it would only be
logical that it's faster, since indeed there's less synchronizing overhead.
>
> > I still have some problems in my load test, but that is all
> related to
> > SQLTransformer. I'll discuss that on C2-dev.
>
> The SQLTransformer gets 2 connections for every request--that
> needs to change,
> or the pool of connections needs to be greatly increased....
>
> > Seems to me excalibur has a loadproof pooling now :)
> >
> > tomK
>
> That was my surmizing as well.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
