Quoting Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:27, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > Dear all
> >
> > I've a initial version of the ExcaliburTestCase ready for committment.
> As
> > it comes to packaging some thought need to be made.
> >
> > From the Excalibur point of view this class should make it into the
> > distributed jar because it eases development based on Excalibur. From
> a
> > projects point of view it is noting that should be deployed into a
> > production environment. The possibilities are:
> >
> > 1. Pack it into avalon-excalibur.jar. As it is only one class a
> separate
> > jar doesn't make much sense.
>
> +1
Ok, how do we package it.
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.ExcaliburTestCase
or
org.apache.avalon.excalibur.test.ExcaliburTestCase
Former will integrate without changes to the build procedure, but later will.
Giacomo
>
>
> >
> > 2. Make a separate jar (avalon-excalibur-test.jar?). Though it is a
> single
> > class but based on junit it might be justifiable to do so.
> >
> > You thoughts?
> >
> > Giacomo
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
> *-----------------------------------------------------*
> * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, *
> * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost *
> * everyone gets busy on the proof." *
> * - John Kenneth Galbraith *
> *-----------------------------------------------------*
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
