On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:31, Charles Benett wrote:
> Here's a thought: can we get rid of all the build.sh/build.bat and
> ant.jar etc?
nice idea but not yet good in practice I don't think. Anything that requires
me to do more than
cvs co myproject
cd myproject
./build.sh
is too much IMHO :)
> Here's why: as currently written, I think, if you already have ANT_HOME
> defined then the build script won't use jakarta-avalon/tools/lib and so
> will miss optional.jar. (Which makes the junit task fail in excalibur).
>
> Either we can make the scripts more complicated to check for junit in a
> pre-existing ANT_HOME or we can simply tell people that they need to
> download and install ant with junit. Then we can remove the build
> scripts and execute the buildfile by invoking 'ant' directly.
alternatively we can go
unset ANT_HOME
in each script?
--
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
* "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, *
* and proving that there is no need to do so - almost *
* everyone gets busy on the proof." *
* - John Kenneth Galbraith *
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
