On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 01:13, Charles Benett wrote:
> For jars in lib's, I'd like to move to using name-version jars (for
> releases)
+1
> or name-date jars for non-released code - specifically between
> avalon subprojects.
-0
Mainly because then we have to maintain code name in two places (in build.xml
and filename).
> This would make it a lot easier to work out and track what's happening.
> Any objections?
Slight objection - but not enough to stop you doing it ;)
--
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
* "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, *
* and proving that there is no need to do so - almost *
* everyone gets busy on the proof." *
* - John Kenneth Galbraith *
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
