Paul Hammant wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >yep. Maybe in proxy package or something.
> >
> It's moved to Excalibur.
>
> There seems to be several forms of excalbur's jar :
>
> * Excalibur makes avalon-excalibur-4.0b5.jar
> * Cornerstone uses avalon-excalibur.jar
> * Phoenix uses avalon-excalibur-20010827.jar
>
> I have updated the one in Cornerstone (as result of DynamicProxy) change
> but feel nerveous about the phoenix one as I suspect there is a
> "special" situation concerning this.
>
> What's the story Peter and should we not have some consistent naming (if
> only for CVS audit trail) ?
Hopefully,
- Phoenix is using a jar compiled from avalon-excalibur code on
20010827.
- Cornerstone is being entirely unhelpful in telling us what version of
excalibur it is using
- Excalibur isn't making 4.0b5 (that hasn't been released yet, has it?)
it should either make 4.0b5dev or 20010827 or 4.0b5dev20010827 (etc)
In other words, Cornerstone and Phoenix should specify exactly which
version (if an actual release) or date (if made from cvs between
releases).
I'm not sure what the easiest thing to do with Excalibur is. One of :
4.0b5dev or 20010827 or 4.0b5dev20010827 would seem to make sense.
Thoughts?
This should also apply to all the subprojects.
Charles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
