On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:40, Michael McKibben wrote:
> I've attached a patch for CLArgsParser and ClutilTestCase which adds the
> requested feature.
committed - taah!
> In trying to be consistent with getArguments(), I added
> two new methods: getArgumentById(int) and getArgumentByName(String). In
> retrospect, should they be renamed getOptions(), and getOptionByXXX since
> they return CLOption?
Not sure - it prolly does make more sense using "option" - what does everyone
else think?
> The patched ClutilTestCase adds a test case for
> validating the two new methods. I created the patches using cvs diff -u
> relative to the project root directory.
yay!
--
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| Never argue with an idiot, they'll drag you down to |
| their level, and beat you with experience |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
