On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 07:25, Paul Hammant wrote:
> >So my question is should we require that services extend service. I can
> > make it required or maybe just sternly warn when Service interfaces are
> > non-compliant or we can deprecate the interface altogether.
>
> Change ... services no longer needing to extend Service :
>
> +1
kool. So do we deprecate the Service interface aswell?
> Would they still requite a member variable called ROLE ?
Naah - thats just a nice convention ;)
> This would be cool as it would allow us (me) to blockify third party
> appications more easily. That is, provided they have seperated into
> interface/implementation.
woohoo.
--
Cheers,
Pete
-----------------------------------------------
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and
human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the
former." -Albert Einstein
-----------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
