Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Leo Sutic wrote:
>
>>
>>> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>
>>> VOTE
>>> ----
>>> Keep getType() method in QueueElement, or kill it?
>>>
>>
>> If I could vote, I would vote "kill". With the strong abilities in
>> Java for reflection, there is no need for it. As for other ports to
>> other languages, Java classes will not appear as queue elements, so
>> why bother?
>>
>> Plus, it messes with my beautiful ReflectionEventHandler.
>
>
>
> The idea to incorporate it is to make the ReflectionEventHandler easier
>
> to implement in C++ where RTTI is not binary compatible accross compilers
> and typically resource intensive.
Your wish is my command. I have removed it. The more I look at it,
the less I like it, and the more hackish it seems.
If there is any actual need for it, we can explore readding it.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>