Concidering the fact that most Avalon systems automatically determine the lifecycles
of the components, I am wondering if we should strive to maintain 100% backwards
compatibility for lifecycle interfaces. The issue is brought to light due to the
LogEnabled interface.
Should it be concidered backwards compatible for a *Component* to change it's lifecycle
interfaces?
VOTE HERE:
PLEASE NOTE:
This does not apply to regular classes and containers. This is only for Components,
which typically have automated mechanisms for starting them up.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
