RE: Divergence from Avalon (was Re: [RT] Is Poolable Harmful?)

[Stephen McConnell]

Peter Royal wrote:
> Sent: Thursday, 10 January, 2002 16:38
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Re: Divergence from Avalon (was Re: [RT] Is Poolable Harmful?)
> 
> 
> On Thursday 10 January 2002 10:26 am, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> > This approach simplifies the use of the Component infrastructure
> > tremendously as we no longer have to have big complex try/catch/finally
> > methods to ensure that we release all components even if they are
> > ThreadSafe.
> 
> Are we going to make lookup() not throw a ComponentException 
> anymore? If not, (or unless ComponentException extends 
> RuntimeException) I don't see how the t/c/f block will go away, as 
> you still have to trap the ComponentException.
> 
> On a side note, I always re-throw any ComponentException's as 
> RuntimeException's, what do other folk do?

I generally rethrow a qualified ComponentException (qualified in 
that it has meaningful context in the exception message).

Steve.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>