On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:51, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> Wouldn't an adapter class for such especial cases be adequate?
> Something like (just a draft):
Similar to what I did. Except mine looked like
> public class LogLevel extends ValuedEnum
> implements Serializable
> {
> private final static Map m_levelMap = new HashMap(5);
>
> public final static LogLevel DEBUG = new LogLevel("DEBUG", 5);
> public final static LogLevel INFO = new LogLevel("INFO", 10);
> public final static LogLevel WARN = new LogLevel("WARN", 15);
> public final static LogLevel ERROR = new LogLevel("ERROR", 20);
> public final static LogLevel FATAL_ERROR = new LogLevel("FATAL_ERROR",
> 25);
>
public static void log( final String message, LogLevel level )
{
...do if statement here...
}
>
> private LogLevel(final String i_name, final int i_value)
> {
> super(i_name, i_value, m_levelMap);
> }
>
> public static LogLevel getLevelForName(final String i_levelName)
> {
> return (LogLevel)m_levelMap.get(i_levelName.toUpperCase());
> }
>
> public String toString()
> {
> return "LogLevel[" + getName() + "/" + getValue() + "]";
> }
>
> private Object readResolve()
> throws ObjectStreamException
> {
> return getLevelForName(getName());
> }
> }
> This would allow to keep the current "clean" interface and
> use this class just for those especial cases.
>
> What do you think?
Either way is good ;)
--
Cheers,
Pete
----------------------------------------
"Liberty means responsibility. That is
why most men dread it." - Locke
----------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
