Peter Donald wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:12, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
>>2. If the current getTime() method is not so important, we could just
>>delete it. (I prefer that one)
>>
>
> Hmm. I did this. I can't see why it was ever implemented. It had virtually
> identical behaviour to the super classes behaviour ? Or am I missing
> something.
I never got around to having it format the date to a human readable form....
The skeleton was there--but that change got lost.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
