On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:52, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Between your's and Leo's comments, I believe we came full circle and > established that the contracts we have now are adequate. We have not > resolved whether the Component interface can be gotten rid of, and for the > reasons of the confusion of what a Component is, I think it would be > detrimental to remove it.
Im not so sure but I have no real need to kill it. > They are useful marker interfaces for systems that take advantage of that > information. I say they need to stay, are part of the Framework, because > the LifeStyle is just as important as the LifeCycle. For 99.9% of all > situations, a Component should be either pooled or shared. 99% aye? Thats funny - I have never used Poolable comonents in applications dev - even when they are not sharable :) -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------------------ militant agnostic: i don't know, and you don't know either. ------------------------------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
