Leif Mortenson wrote: > The pool implementation that I had needed this for is now in the same > package. I will put off making this change unless the need arises again.
Glad to hear it :) > > Cheers, > Leif > > Leif Mortenson wrote: > > >>I am writing another implementation of a AbstractJdbcConnectionPool. In >>order to be able to use the current AbstractJdbcConnection class, I >>needed to modify the class so that the setPool method is public rather >>than protected. >> >>This class has LF problems in CVS, so I couldn't do a diff. I sent in a >>corrected version of the file on my last post titled Re: SELECT 1 Here >>is the change though for this message. >> >>< protected void setPool(Pool pool) >> >> >>>public void setPool(Pool pool) >>> >>> >>Thanks, >>Leif >> >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > . > > -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
