Berin Loritsch wrote:
I think I found it: constructors were declared with protected access.
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodException
> at java.lang.Class.getConstructor0(Class.java:1755)
> at java.lang.Class.getConstructor(Class.java:990)
> at
>
>org.apache.avalon.excalibur.system.AbstractContainer.getHandler(AbstractContainer.java:291)
>
>
> at
> com.infoplanning.printnode.PrintNode.setupNotifier(PrintNode.java:188)
> at
> com.infoplanning.printnode.PrintNode.configure(PrintNode.java:95)
> at
>
>org.apache.avalon.excalibur.system.ContainerManager.initializeContainer(ContainerManager.java:306)
>
>
> at
>
>org.apache.avalon.excalibur.system.ContainerManager.recycleContainer(ContainerManager.java:379)
>
>
> at
>
>org.apache.avalon.excalibur.system.ContainerManager.<init>(ContainerManager.java:209)
>
> at
>
>org.apache.avalon.excalibur.system.ContainerManager.<init>(ContainerManager.java:183)
>
> at
>
>org.apache.avalon.excalibur.system.ContainerManager.<init>(ContainerManager.java:173)
>
> at com.infoplanning.printnode.Main.main(Main.java:72)
>
> I am getting this exception from my Container that is extending
> AbstractContainer.
>
> The problem is that JDK 1.4 is complainging that the Handler does not
> have a constructor
> that matches the signature in ContainerManager.HANDLER_CONSTRUCTOR. It
> appears to be
> the same, Does anyone have a clue that can help me out?
>
> The only other thing I can think of to do is to have the default
> constructor and add the
> elements in a setup() method. I may have to do that just to get beyond
> this.
>
>
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
