Stephen McConnell wrote:
> I understand and support the concern re. mixing in the Parameter
> object. Personally I would prefer Map over Query. Here is my
> understanding of what the interface would look like (all method
> included) based on quasi "consensus" at this stage + your
> suggested replacement of Parameters with Map.
>
> interface ServiceManager
> {
> Object lookup( final String role );
> Object lookup( final String role, final Map attributes );
> boolean hasObject( final String role );
> void release( Object object );
> }
>
> Is this ok with everyone?
I can't vote, but it looks fine to me. For what it's worth, Parameters
would allow us to define the needed component with a single string, e.g.
"com.mycompany.MyComponent:myParam=value,yourParam=42", but Map does
allow potentially more efficient implementations.
(: Anrie ;)
--
Antti Koivunen | "Anrie" [un-ree] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------
The song of life might not be a simple one,
but there's plenty of room for improvisation.
---------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
