Peter Donald wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:07, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
>
>>I really think that my silly token based mechanism is much
>>lighter and efficient than a child CM would be.
>>
>
> How so? I can't see any difference at all ...
Well, I suppose at least these points apply (see my previous mail):
- The component using the SM couldn't explicitly release any
resources (scarce recources held for the duration of the request).
- The added complexity/cost of creating and using SM delegates
(though the performance hit is quite small).
(: A ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
