There's nothing about JDKs. Should compile & run with version 1.3 and 1.4, perhaps?
Also, should follow that last legal stuff sent out over [EMAIL PROTECTED] :) On a related note, how do we handle versioning and compatibilities (which could get very messy with all those jars lying around). cheers, and happy easter, - Leo > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Verzonden: Sunday, March 31, 2002 12:21 AM > Aan: Avalon Developers List > Onderwerp: Release requirements? > > > Hi, > > I was thinking about what should be the minimum requirements for us to > release a component from excalibur. I was thinking that the > following would > be good as minimum requirements. > > * must pass checkstyle with 0 violations (which basically means lots more > javadocing) > * must pass all unit tests > * must have one or more examples showing how to use package > * must not have any circular dependencies in package structure > * must have package.html that describes basic package usage (and possibly > redirects to examples directory for more complete examples) > * must have docs/index.html that describes basic purpose and scope of > component > * should have links to examples/ and package.html from docs/index.html > * should have 0 errors when performing javadoc > > Comments? > > -- > Cheers, > > Pete > > -------------------------------------------- > Beer is proof that God loves us and wants > us to be happy. -- Benjamin Franklin > -------------------------------------------- > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
