> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Berin, > > Fortress is depending on depchecker.xml which has not been booked in. > Also, Fortress is not bound into the top level build.xml
Ok. > I guess this is all a bit moot if we have another rename or > fortress to > container (Leo suggests, I feel he has a valid point). Why? container is already taken (scratchpad) for things backported from Phoenix. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
