Leif Mortenson wrote:
> I committed the original patch. I would rather not have Instrument have
> any dependencies.
> Maybe having an AbstractLogEnabledInstrumentable in the logger subproject?
> Not too unmovable on adding the dependency, but it is nice to have it
> independent.
> If the AbstractLogEnabledInstrumentable class was in addition to the
> AbstractInstrumentable
> class, then the dependency would only be at compile time and so users
> who were not using
> framework could still use the Instrumentable classes.
>
> Thoughts?
>
How are we handling optional dependancies now? It would be good as an
option.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
