Peter Donald wrote:
> At 03:02 AM 6/11/2002 +0200, you wrote:
> > Why?
>
>> The backpointers can be establihed in the ComponentInfo constructor
>
>
> god no. Descriptors are immutable and they should stay that way.
>
[Steve is in his office saying really nasty things about Pete @#!%& ]
Ok, I'll go over my stuff and do a damage assessment!
In the meantime - the metadata/ComponentMetaData contains a name and an
array of dependency metadata instances. The javadoc for the m_name
state member is a little unclear. I'm assuming that m_name corresponds
to a unique key within an application scope that can be referenced by
the m_name member in the DependencyMetaData class.
Or to put it more simply - m_name in DependencyMetaData is the name of a
ComponentMetaData instance. Is that correct?
Steve.
>
>> - totally transparent to Phoenix or any other client.
>
>
> I was planning on transparently using the descriptors in Phoenix
> (which unlikely to have ComponentInfo just yet due to compatability
> reasons). I suppose I could copy-paste code but I would prefer not to ;)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter Donald
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind,
> and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
> everyone gets busy on the proof."
> - John Kenneth Galbraith
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
