On Tuesday 11 June 2002 09:27 am, Berin Loritsch wrote: > The decision stems from the best way to have a unique name for a role, > without being subject to naming clashes. It would be really bad and
I've always viewed it as a "best practices" method for naming roles. Roles don't *have* to be named after their interfaces but its easy enough to do and makes sense. imho, Stephan was balking at "role name == interface name" as a concrete truth for Avalon Framework. Its not, its just highly recommended. -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
