RE: [Summary] Avalon 5 ComponentManager interface

[Leo Sutic]

> From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> 
> > From: Leo Sutic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  
> <snip/>
> 
> >     public void doStuff () {
> >         Transformer transformer = transformerManager.getTransformer
> ();
> >         try {
> >         } finally {
> >             transformerManager.release (transformer);
> >             // OR
> >             transformer.release();
> >             // OR
> >             transformer.endDocument();
> >         }
> >     }
> 
> Why not standardize on one approach? I.e., leave only 
> transformerManager.release (transformer) or 
> transformer.release(), and don't have zoo of different 
> methods doing the same?

Because I did not think I could get that through the 
voting process. The current proposal is a best compromise.

If you want to push for it, I'm with you, but I think we'll
deadlock.

/LS


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>