At 05:47 PM 6/14/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>I would like to have your vote on this design constraint on Avalon 5:
>
>   all possible efforts should be done to avoid avalon forking

Avalon has already been forked. There is a whole bunch of stuff in there 
that was added in for Cocoon that is not used anywhere else. A5 will unify 
the model or else it wont occur at all. A4 may not be perfect but it is 
definelty good enough for me. The problems with it are due to misuse of 
features and lack of unified metadata or container utilities.

Metadata support is underway and hopefuly will ease that pain. Container 
utilities are also on the way and hopefully that will encourage people to 
not misuse features (by not natively supporting them).

>So, what do you think?

It is a good idea. However if anyone was to try and force usage patterns 
that result from a specific  container - especially when those usage 
patterns could be considered problematic then I think it wont work.

I have looked at all the containers and believe I know where we can 
continue to work together but there are somethings there will need to be 
compromises from all. However when I hear predictions of Doom and 
ultimatims I find myself thinking A4 is going to be about for a long time 
yet ;)


Cheers,

Peter Donald
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind,
and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
everyone gets busy on the proof."
              - John Kenneth Galbraith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to