On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 08:55:07AM -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> We keep talking about the ECM as if it were an exemplary container,
> and we all know it is not. Please do not pretend to give migration
> paths for it. We should encourage the migration to one of the other
> containers, be it Fortress, Phoenix, or Merlin.
>
> ECM should be considered a backwards compatibility layer, and
> deprecated.
> Before we can slap the deprecation declaration on the package we must
> finish the proposed replacement (Fortress) so that it is easier to use
> and to develop with.
What's still left to be done on Fortress ?
Cheers
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&'
&&&&.
&&&&&&&:
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
