Leo Sutic wrote:
>Stephen,
>
>are you arguing against the use of the word "freedom" in this
>context, or against something else?
>
>That is, would you remove your -1 if "freedom" was replaced with
>another word, say "features"?
>
>I do not quite follow you...
>
I'm arguming aginst what is implied in Berlin's post:
Implications of the post are:
1. assertion that containerkit is overly complex (which I
happen to completely disagree with) when the real issue
is the implications this has on concretly defining a
component - emotive words are used in the post that bypass
the real question
2. discussing the merits of thread safety in A5 when in fact
the framework does not concretely support this - kernals
and containers above framework do this but the assertion
is being made that this is a framework issue - it is in
terms of future development - but this is in terms of
delivering something concrete that does not exist in the
framework today
Cheers, Steve.
>
>
>/LS
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
