*coughs*... > This is an interesting history lesson - really interesting! I'm holding > on to my objections to the points noted above, but my objections are not > really relevant to the fundimentals of your post. To me those > fundimentals your are raising can be distilled down to the recognition > of two different needs and the observation the these needs have been > folded together in the context of mutual interests - but in doing so, > the longer term implication have to some extend been compromised > something. Was the compromise justified - my guess is yes - after all > Avalon is here today and it is the best framework I know of - > compromises inclusive.
...okay, so I missed Stefano's intentions here. This sums up rather nicely what I said rather clumsily. cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
