Peter Donald wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:08, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>Peter Donald wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:26, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>>
>>>>Peter Donald wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>It really comes down to what the component writer wants to classify as a
>>>>>constraint and what they want to classify as a hint/policy. The
>>>>>component writer could choose to make "secure" a constraint or they
>>>>>could choose to make it a hint.
>>>>
>>>>Peter, what you say makes sense, but how the f**k can you make the client
>>>>specify a hint||constraint with
>>>>
>>>> SSLSocket sslSocket = (SSLSocket)cm.lookup(socketType);
>>>>
>>>>?!?!?!?!?!?
>>>
>>>ummm ... metadata?
>>
>>Me no understand.
>>Me need to see code. Example.
>>Please help poor programmer.
>
>
> It is no different from any of the other example I have given so go read the
> archives.
I looked at them again, but didn't find the answers I need.
<begging-mode>Please give me a link or some key words</begging-mode>
>>>BTW there is not a chance that I would suggest that you directly extract
>>>a resource directly from a ComponentManager. That would suck
>>>unbelievably, would never scale and lead to all sorts of design
>>>compromises. You aquire a SocketManager who does the work.
>>
>>?
>>
>>If my component is Composable, I get a ComponentManager, not a
>>SocketManager.
>>I don't want to make a SocketManager.
>>I want to use a pre-built Manager.
>
>
> Then your program wont scale, will be hell to maintain and suffer from pattern
> hell. Self induced aswell - you don't honestly expect me to feel sorry for
> you do you? :)
;-) hehehe
Let me see if I understand.
ComponentManager should give you course grained components.
This means that a simple lookup is always enough.
This is more easily understood if we think of Blocks or services.
This would mean (Cocoon example) that the cm would not give you a
Transformer or a Generator, but a service that manages them.
This service would have his own logic of query and selection; it's more
near to implementations and has more knowledge of how it all works.
Is this it?
Let me say anyway that I don't particularly like the fact that a
developer has to write a Manager, but I suppose that this is what
ContainerKit is for?
>>Do I have to pay you to get example in code or are you gonna enlighten
>>me for free if I whine enough?
>
>
> What has been wrong with any of the other code examples?
<doing action="banging head on the wall">Don't find 'em :-(</doing>
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
