On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:39, Berin Loritsch wrote: > I recently added some code that wraps a ComponentManager and puts a > ServiceManager fa�ade on it. I did the reverse process. This allows > a container that wants to use a parent XXXManager to pass in the > parent regardless of whether we are using a ServiceManager fa�ade > or a ComponentManager fa�ade. > > It would probably be a good thing to have in Framework as a > compatibility > layer for that sort of thing. > > +1 from me.
-1 I really don't see too much need for it. It will only clutter up framework more and it is not like it is hard to write. Less is more. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *------------------------------------------------* | You can't wake a person who is pretending | | to be asleep. -Navajo Proverb. | *------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
