Robert wrote:
>Not sure if you are actually taking user requirements or not, but here
>is my .02....
>
>I agree with Kasper's comments on the naming madness
>
<bigSnip/>
>>From a useability point of view, I would caution against the 'ultimate'
>container and setup. You would probably run into the eventual problems
>that face EJB servers now, namely hard to configure and use. I currently
>use ECM because it was simple to use and I don't mind moving to its
>eventual replacement as long as it is simple to use as well. I don't
>mind config files and meta-data, but please make the container APIs easy
>to use.
>
<note>
Another vote for the simple-dumb-elegant approach from a
non-committer ! Like Peter Donald says, less is more.
</note>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
