Leo Simons wrote:
> I propose we update the website so that logkit is listed as a part of
> excalibur.
>
> reasoning: it will be somewhat less confusing for newbies when logkit is
> not mentioned on the front page. Many people apparantly get the idea the
> rest of avalon enforces/requires usage of logkit. Putting it in
> excalibur sort of puts it forward as "the default logging
> implementation", which is nice.
>
> change will basically involve updating a few xdoc files. I'm not
> proposing a change to CVS or distribution organisation.
>
> this can probably be a lazy vote; no -1s will mean I'll get to this
> sometime next weekend or so.
-0
Logkit is basically between Commons stuff and the proposed Services stuff.
IMHO Excalibur should keep containers, not logging stuff.
Putting it in excalibur could give the opposite impression, ie that it's
part of all containers.
I would not move it ATM till we get stuff in Commons and have a more
clear container refactoring.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
