> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Leo Sutic wrote:
>
> >Stephen,
> >
> >I'm all for your approach - it certainly is better than what we have
> >now.
> >
> >But I would like to solve the cases where the context entry is either
> >
> > + a value (like a java.io.File) provided by the container
> >
> >
>
> Drop dead simple:
>
> <context>
> <entry name="home" class="java.io.File" value="myFile.xml"/>
> </context>
>
> Pass this configuration fragment to ContextFactory and you get back a
> context object with an instance of File accessible under the home key.
No! Then the value is taken from the application profile. I was
referring
to the case when the container generates the value independent of the
application profile.
The case you describe is solved (and is in itself a major step forward).
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
