At 03:45 PM 7/6/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Why not merge ServiceDesignator and ServiceDescriptor into
>ServiceDescriptor? Since a dependency can specify version, why not
>extend it with attributes as well?
Thats how we originally had it. However a dependency also has attributes
and it felt a bit wierd that a dependency had attributes and that the
service definition inside dependency also had attributes.
It now looks like
<dependency>
<role>blah</role>
<service classname="FooService"/>
<attributes>
<attribute ...>
<attributes>
</dependency>
so attributes are associated with dependency directly rather than via
service reference.
Like?
Cheers,
Peter Donald
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind,
and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
everyone gets busy on the proof."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
