> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Ok, we have a real problem. > > ? Aren't we gonna use the avalon-site skin now? > The jakarta-site skin was based on the old avalon skin, it > was put there > just in case you hated the new avalon-site skin, but it can > be easilly > nuked. > > What's the problem? > > Leo has worked on the avalon-site skin, let's just look at > that and make > it better where applicable.
The last official vote we had, and liked the results was when we had the http://jakart.apache.org/avalon/index.html skin. Most of the site (with a few exceptions) follow that look. The fact that we have *LOST* that skin is bad. (yes I know it's in CVS archives, but after I find it I have to integrate it into the skins...). That jakarta-site skin is not like the rest of jakarta or what we used to have. I don't really want Avalon to look like it is completely disjunct from Jakarta, it's hosting project. I don't think it is appropriate. We can deviate where it makes sense, but what is in the avalon-site makes it look like we belong to the krysalis project. Why didn't we work with what we had, and evolve that? If we came up with several skins, we should have voted before it was put in place. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
