Peter Royal wrote:
>On Friday 12 July 2002 05:50 pm, Peter Donald wrote:
>
>
>>At 08:11 PM 7/12/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>>proyal 2002/07/12 13:11:34
>>>
>>> Added: src/java/org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration
>>> ConfigurationUtil.java
>>> Log:
>>> * Moved from org.apache.excalibur.configuration.ConfigurationUtil
>>>(inside merlin)
>>> * Added branch() per thread
>>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102347724100002&r=1&w=2
>>>
>>>
>>-1 on addition to framework CVS. Too much clutter and not consistent with
>>the rest of packages. Move to excalibur.util package if it is really
>>desired.
>>
>>
>
>How about the creation of an excalibur.configuration ?
>
+1
That's where is was up until a few weeks ago. I would prefer to see
this as small package containing just the configuration utilities
(CascadingConfiguration, ConfigurationUtil, and other specifically
related to configuration management). Putting it back under
excalibur/configuration also maintains consistentency with respect to
the other users of the package outside of Avalon.
>Or would you prefer excalibur.util.configuration ?
>
-1
Clutters up dependecies with extra stuff.
>
>I'm going to be moving CascadingConfiguration to be visible outside of merlin
>soon too, so it and ConfigurationUtil should live together.
>
+1
>
>I'm fine for either approach, but it'll be sat before i get a chance to do so.
>-pete
>
>ps. i have block configuration validation working, expect a commit soon,
>whoho!
>
>
What exactly are you validating here ?
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
