On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:39, Jeff Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:54:40AM +0100, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > <zip zipfile="${bin.dist.dir}/src.zip" compress="false">
> > <zipfileset dir="src/java"/>
> > </zip>
> >
> > The above seems to be typical in build files. i.e. binary distributions
> > include source.
They are not "binary" distributions but just distributions ;) ie I think I
removed the -bin suffix where I added src.zips into dist.
> > I'm a little uncomfortable as this means that downloaders can see source
> > but have no ability to compile it as related non java source and files
> > are missing. Are we really happy with this?
>
> Probably it's just for reference; when debugging a stacktrace, I find it
> useful to be able to look up the indicated line number. Also, browsing
> code is often more productive than browsing javadocs. Plus it emphasises
> that this is open source code.
Yep - that was the main reason for it.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
*---------------------------------------------------------*
| Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user-friendly. It |
| just happens to be selective on who it makes friendship |
| with. |
| - Richard Cook |
*---------------------------------------------------------*
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
